<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get Some Personality: Branding with Custom Type</title>
	<atom:link href="http://typeclub.com/2008/02/29/get-some-personality-branding-with-custom-type/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://typeclub.com/2008/02/29/get-some-personality-branding-with-custom-type/</link>
	<description>Mission: To promote good typography</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Couch</title>
		<link>http://typeclub.com/2008/02/29/get-some-personality-branding-with-custom-type/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Couch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://typeclub.com/2008/02/29/get-some-personality-branding-with-custom-type/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Hey. Thanks for the talk last night - truly inspiring. Of course, as my brain is still trying to wrap itself around typography and type design (student), I come up with thoughts far too late to have added them to the discussion during the Q &#38; A.
So - on the topic of Type Classification, I'm of the belief that the system of classification as it stands now (which, I believe it was said last night that there are 15 type classes) will force the new, budding type designer to use more free-hand works when designing with type. That you can't just simply type '1920s gangster' into a type index will ensure that the historiography of type design remains intact; that in order to choose a type for a project, you'd be forced to do the research first - or, as it seemed Barry and Peter suggested emphatically, draw it by hand to get exactly what you want. Just a thought. Thanks again for last night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey. Thanks for the talk last night - truly inspiring. Of course, as my brain is still trying to wrap itself around typography and type design (student), I come up with thoughts far too late to have added them to the discussion during the Q &amp; A.<br />
So - on the topic of Type Classification, I&#8217;m of the belief that the system of classification as it stands now (which, I believe it was said last night that there are 15 type classes) will force the new, budding type designer to use more free-hand works when designing with type. That you can&#8217;t just simply type &#8216;1920s gangster&#8217; into a type index will ensure that the historiography of type design remains intact; that in order to choose a type for a project, you&#8217;d be forced to do the research first - or, as it seemed Barry and Peter suggested emphatically, draw it by hand to get exactly what you want. Just a thought. Thanks again for last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
